Virginia, plain?

IMG_3391

So. Back in the summer – yes, we really had a summer, seems a long time ago now doesn’t it? – back in the summer, when the weather was, for the first time in living memory, genuinely summery, we went away. Can you guess where we were?

IMG_3390

Now you know!

We went to visit my in-laws: the Professor (hi A!) and the Rocket Scientist – how fulfilling must it be to work in a place where you can say: “It is rocket science!” But I digress, both from the truth* and from the story of our holiday. We were staying in Virginia, close to Alexandria, which in turn is close to Washington DC – hence the photo with good ole Abe.

We did many of the things you might expect tourists to do – the presidential memorials, the Smithsonian’s many museums etc, (try the Native American museum’s cafe – superb!), Mount Vernon (George Washington’s house), and some less obvious ones – Fort Washington on the Maryland bank of the Potomac, Chicago live at Wolf Trap (an interesting experience – my sister-in-law was given tickets, she thought at first for a production of the musical Chicago – when she realised that in fact it was the band Chicago, I think she thought they might be more age-appropriate for TBH and I. You know Chicago – all the hits, like ‘If You Leave Me Now’, and, erm, er…..Well anyway, TBH liked the singing, but hated the musical interludes (“Too many notes”). I felt the opposite – a bit Jack Spratt and spouse).

It was a great trip –  a fabulous family get together, great to meet two nephews who we’ve only ever spoken to on Skype before.

And….all the wildlife! Who knew? Not me certainly.

Close to where we stayed was a fabulous place called Huntley Meadows. The land here once belonged to George Mason (one of the Founding Fathers) and was farmland, but it’s now a wetland surrounded by forest.

IMG_3457

The wetland is amazing, with an incredible diversity of flora and fauna. The first striking thing was the number and variety of turtles around. These were relatively small specimens, but we also saw much larger ones swimming out in deeper water.

IMG_3459

On our first visit, we struck lucky and this fellow….

DSCF0661

…swam along a channel straight towards us, then under the boardwalk where we stood and into a large beaver lodge (well it seemed large to me, though I’m not really qualified to say – it’s the first one I ever saw!). The kids were adamant that it was a beaver, and they may well be right, but if it was, it was relatively small for a beaver. Maybe it’s a muskrat? B is sure that it had the wide tail characteristic of a beaver and he’s pretty sharp where natural history is concerned. Either way – we were all very excited.

Less dramatic, but equally fascinating, several bushes nearby had been completely stripped of leaves by these large caterpillars….

DSCF0676

..and these too….

DSCF0677

On subsequent visits we spotted some smaller cousins….

DSCF0354

DSCF0360

And in many places we visited we saw tent webs, some quite large…

IMG_3337

…which were full of little wrigglers….

DSCF0394

Of course, where there are caterpillars, there are likely to be butterflies and moths too. And there were. We saw them everywhere we went. In the car park of the local mall, a huge dilapidated hawkmoth. In the woods at Huntley Meadows, this rather muted and well camouflaged butterfly, which perversely, is perhaps my favourite amongst the many we saw…

DSCF0640

And there really were a lot. Large swallowtails were most notable, but the variety in shape and size and colour was astonishing. And all of them new and unknown to us – except, surprisingly, for a handful of Red Admirals. Here’s a small sample….

DSCF0884

IMG_3270

IMG_3400

IMG_3421

IMG_3450

IMG_3454

IMG_3466

IMG_3480

As I say, we saw butterflies just about everywhere, but most of these photos were taken at River Farm, the headquarters of the American Horticultural Society, which is on the banks of the Potomac. A wildflower meadow there was particularly rich in insect and bird life. (Imagine a British wildflower meadow on steroids – everything way over head height, huge flowers, huge bees and wasps etc)

Huntley Meadows also had a huge variety of dragonflies. but they were even more elusive than the butterflies and so will have to be represented by just one photo…

DSCF0725

One memorable feature of our stay was the constant loud racket of cicadas. At Wolf Trap – which is an outdoor venue – they were louder than the band. These insects live initially underground as nymphs, but then crawl up a tree to emerge, like a dragonfly does, from their skins. Here is the exuvia (discarded exoskeleton) of a cicada….

IMG_3393

We saw three on the bark of a tree by the Potomac in Washington. And sheltering under the bark of the same tree…

IMG_3395

An adult cicada.

I suspect that this is another….

IMG_3451

…probably of a different species. B found it at River Farm.

IMG_3452

It was dead, and therefore very amenable to being photographed from different angles.

IMG_3453

Another River Farm tenant…

IMG_3410

Here’s the building at River Farm….

IMG_3417

…taken from one of the paths through the meadow. The gnarly old tree in the foreground had my attention because I was both interested and slightly wary of the bustle of activity around the small hollow in it’s trunk…

IMG_3416

IMG_3427

I had decided not to take my ‘bulky’ camera away with me – a decision which I began to regret almost immediately we arrived. The rest of the family all had point and snaps with them and at various times I borrowed them all. Some of these photos I took, but not by any means all of them.

IMG_3463

IMG_3486

DSCF0383

One insect we took a close interest in, but didn’t photograph, were the fireflies which whizzed around the garden every evening as it grew dark. Prof A organised a hunt and the kids had soon filled a jam-jar with them. (Well – not filled, but they had caught a lot.)

Of course wherever there are bugs, there are bound to be predators.

I’m not sure whether this arachnid, photographed in the woods at Huntley Meadows, is a spider or a harvestman.

DSCF0411

These frogs, very green and quite large relative to British frogs, were numerous at Huntley meadows…

DSCF0691

I think that it may be the American Bullfrog.

DSCF0738

These two species of tiny frogs…

DSCF0372

…may have been equally numerous, but we only saw a few, and then only thanks to eagle-eyed B spotting the first of them.

IMG_3495

I found a helpful website on the frogs of Virginia (there seem to be many species) and I think that this may be the Spring Peeper.

IMG_3496

The centre of these large leaves seem to be popular with small frogs. This…

IMG_3487

….is a green treefrog, the pale stripe is pretty distinctive. Here’s another….

DSCF0371

I’ve never seen a treefrog in the wild before, but this was only one of many firsts.

We saw a couple of small snakes during our visit, and quite a few lizards.

DSCF0881

Including a Komodo Dragon (another first)…

DSCF0334

But that was at Washington Zoo!

*I’m not sure that, strictly speaking, Dr A is a rocket scientist, although she is an astrophysicist and she does work for NASA, so how much closer can you get?

Virginia, plain?

18 thoughts on “Virginia, plain?

  1. Insectopia or what! Pretty good photos as well from a point and shoot. I had no idea there was so much diversity over there on the east coast.

    Chicago hits? “Hard habit to break” I remember. Do I get 5 points?

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      I wasn’t even remotely prepared for just how exotic the wildlife would be. Although, since we were close to DC we were in a fairly built up area, the impression I had was that nature was always on the verge of taking over – archetypal manicured lawns were the exception rather than the rule. A and S’s house was, for all intents and purposes, in a forest. It really was fantastic – S keeps asking when we will go again. (Next time apparently, the plan is to go to Upstate New York, by a lake – better start saving my pennies).
      5 Pop Pickers Points yes – but I’m not sure what that does for your credibility.

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      I don’t think I realised that they were cicadas at the time – just interesting bugs and I’m always fascinated by insects. (Slowly working my way through an interesting, quirky book about insects ‘Insectopedia’ by Hugh Raffles – it has a section on bees but I haven’t got to that yet, in truth I’ve barely started.)

  2. O.M. says:

    Damn you ! i used to attribute your excellent wildlife closeups to a very expensive fancy camera.
    Chicago were almost cool in a Blood Sweat and Tears kind of way with the first album and 25 or 6to4. Very quickly went MOR.

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      It seems that even fairly cheap digital cameras are pretty good these days. I was really impressed by the kids cameras – once we worked out how to put the macro setting on. The camera I generally use cost about £200 – does that make it expensive? I’m still pondering an upgrade but I think that will have to wait, partly due to the cost, and partly because I have no idea what I would want to replace it with.
      I was surprised by some of the Chicago stuff, because I really enjoyed it – I’m a sucker for anything with plenty of brass to the fore and some of the songs they played were surprisingly funky. I was listening to 25 or 6 to 4 on Youtube just yesterday and enjoyed it. But yes – most of their back catalogue is horribly MOR.

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      I seem to have become a bit of a bug fanatic, which is abit odd I suppose – still, it takes all sorts! Thanks for dropping by.

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      ‘Glory of Love’ – you had me there. I had to Google it. I’m generally more of a ‘short songs with three chords and no solos’ sort of chap.
      That’s two trips to the States now for me and I have to agree with you – can’t wait to go again! Hopefully it will be a bit less than 11 years between visits this time.

  3. I thought I’d dropped into the wrong blog for a minute. Architecture; statues; hmm…does Mark still live here anymore?

    Then…

    They appeared…all things creepie-crawly.

    I’m always amazed at what you find…I get excited if I spot a leaf!

    That big caterpillar is a corker…exactly how big was it?

    Bit concerned that you are resorting to photographing corpses to make up the photo quota though! 😀

    PS what’s with all this login business?

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      The caterpillars in the first two caterpillar photos were enormous – much bigger than anything I’ve seen over here, even the a elephant Hawkmoth caterpillar which is also pretty big.

      Login business?

  4. My God even after I’d filled in the details it didn’t actually want my email address and kicked me out to WordPress login to sign in again. Also if you click on an icon first like it asks you to, it appears that it’s asking you to fill in the details anyway. Aargh.

    For this comment I left the email part blank but left the next two fields in. Then pressed on WordPress which brought up the wee login message…pressed the logo again ( to see what would happen) and it brought up my reply in a frame with me logged into (and commenting from) WordPress . Yippee!

    You must have had some spam attack to rig this up Mark 😆

    1. beatingthebounds says:

      I wasn’t aware of any of this! I’d prefer it to be easy to comment – it’s not like there are hoards of loons hanging around here wanting to leave inflammatory comments, at least, I don’t think there are.

      1. Maybe in Settings;Discussion:Other Comment Settings, there are boxes ticked that you didn’t intend to have ticked, Mark. I’ve had weird things happen before when I’ve eg changed blog theme. Simon has complained a couple of times about having to set up a login again on my blog – still no idea why…other than maybe when I’ve changed theme.

      2. Just discovered a catchpa on my blog on the email sharing button at the end of posts. Didn’t know that WordPress used catchpas. Wonder what other blocks to comments etc. there are that we don’t know about. You come across anything?

        1. beatingthebounds says:

          Sorry Ken, catchpas?
          Are you still struggling to comment here? I thought I removed the requirement to log in, but it’s hard to tell from this end.

          1. Looks like I can comment without signing in quite easily now, thanks Mark. I suspect because I hadn’t been around for a while the blog had automatically signed me out and that’s why I had to go through a long winded process.

            Catchpa’s …these awful protection “guess the letters and numbers” things that you find on Bloggers blogs. I discovered one when I pressed one of the share buttons on my own blog in WordPress – didn’t realise we had them until then. Just wondered if you had discovered anything similar on your own?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s